http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm File scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm#oldcode20 scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm:20: (define define-ly-syntax define-public) Instead of removing this definition (like I did), would it be possible to use a macro here? Something like (defmacro define-ly-syntax (args . body) `(define-public ,args ,body)) This is untested. http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm File scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm#newcode27 scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm:27: `(define-public ,args I forgot why I changed this... Is there a reason why "primitive-eval" was used here in the first place? http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm#newcode250 scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm:250: (define-public (partial parser location dur) This part needs to be rebased against current master. http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
