Hi Patrick, On 28/10/10 06:32, Patrick McCarty wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Ian Hulin <i...@hulin.org.uk> wrote: >> >> I've just done some stuff with this file to ensure it compiles OK when >> running using Guile V1.9. >> >> It declares all it stuff in a module (define-module (scm dislplay-lily) >> >> It currently gets loaded by lily.scm as part of the dynamic load list >> near the end of the file. Â However, things declared as modules for use >> in the base 'lily' module are pulled in via a (use-modules) statement >> near the start of the file. >> >> Should display-lily.scm move from the ly:load list to the (use-modules) >> list? > > I'm a bit confused by this question... > > As I understand it, module (scm display-lily) is loaded via > (use-modules ...) in music-functions.scm, on line 216. > > So, when the Guile 1.9 scheme compiler compiles music-functions.scm, > it compiles display-lily.scm automatically at that point. > > Then, at the bottom of display-lily.scm, > define-music-display-methods.scm is loaded. > > Is this the spot you are asking about?
Kind of. I missed that lily.scm didn't load display-lily directly. However as display-lily and define-music-display-methods all generate a module (scm display-lily), wouldn't it be better for Guile V1.9 to process it along with the other modules when lily.scm loads up the modules needed for the 'lily' module at lily.scm:202? Are there negative performance implications in doing this using Guile V1.8.7? > > Thanks, > Patrick > > PS. I can't review your latest curried-definitions patch until this > weekend, at the earliest. Sorry about that. No probs. I'll be away in Manchester at the BASBWE conference at the RNCM with my Wind Band over the weekend. Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
