On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:46 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Are there good reasons left for not allowing music functions to take > pitches as arguments? That would allow implementing something like > \transpose as a music function. The alternative, letting it take a > music event and not checking its duration and hoping that it is a single > note, seems quite less elegant.
Music functions *can* take a ly:pitch as argument: toto = #(define-music-function (parser location pitch) (ly:pitch?) (make-music 'NoteEvent 'duration (ly:make-duration 2 0 1 1) 'pitch pitch)) { a \toto #(ly:make-pitch 0 0 0) b } However, having to type #(ly:make-pitch x x x) is hardly convenient from a user point of view. > Since argument signatures of music functions and markup functions are by > now processed as lists instead of fixed combinations, adding new > argument types does not seem to have significant drawbacks. I may be totally wrong, but it seems to me that what you're suggesting amounts to actually create a new type, that would be a one-note ly:music type whose duration is disregarded. (I'm not saying it would be a bad idea, though.) Cheers, Valentin. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel