On 2010/10/31 22:24:17, Neil Puttock wrote:
Hi Carl,
This is too complicated (though that's really a criticism of Marc's
Scheme
engraver).
The point of using 'tie-follow is that it defers the decision to
parenthesize
TabNoteHead to the point where it matters: in the callbacks for
Glissando and
Slur. Thus there should be no need to acknowledge glissandos and
slurs in the
engraver: we only need to check whether the tie's right bound is one
of the
acknowledged noteheads.
Ah, yes. I hadn't thought through the logic carefully; I was just implementing Marc's logic in C++. Glissandos and slurs are irrelevant for determining tied-to. A note is tied-to if it's at the right hand end of a tie. Whether it's parenthesized or not is determined by the presence of a split tie, a glissando, or a slur. So we don't need to acknowledge glissando or slur. Just tie and note_head. Got it! Thanks, Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/2723043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
