On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > On 12/14/10 10:26 AM, "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> wrote: > >> There are currently 8 issues to verify that could and should have been >> verified. I've asked the bug squad to check them, and I've been over them >> myself and I don't have the skills to check them. Could any developer who >> can, please look at http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=7 and >> verify any that they can? Given that we're close to a release candidate, we >> desperately need to clear this list. > > Issues 1249 and 1265 require somebody who can use the Guile V2 stuff. > Patrick, I think this is you, isn't it? Since it's Ian's patch, can you > verify it?
Yes, I'll verify it after I check the state of my Guile 2 branch. > I've asked Patrick for a regtest for 1407 so that somebody can validate that > issue. I've added a comment to 1407 about the process for verification. If nobody wants to tackle it, I've just verified with 2.13.43 :) A proper regtest will have to wait until we add a new font to GUB. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
