Mike Solomon <mikesol <at> ufl.edu> writes: > I've included before and after photos.
Hi Mike. The hemidemisemiquaver(*) and the minim are supposed to be simultaneous, so I do not like the horizontal shift. There is no mention in issue 39 of the desired output. The only thing I can imagine wanting done automatically is lengthening the stem. Is it too late for that when note-collisions are being handled? If the best achievable output is only slightly more preferable than the collision, but costs significant computation for every note-collision, we might want to simply note this one as 'not worth fixing with the methods tried so far'. I'll still try your patch. -- Keith [*] I'm American, actually, so would normally say 64th note; I just like the cheap thrill I get out of writing hemidemisemiquaver. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
