On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 18:37 -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 1/22/11 5:09 AM, "Bernard Hurley" <bern...@marcade.biz> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:29AM +0000, c.m.bryan wrote:
> >> Hi, I have an interesting question.  I know lilypond is not really
> >> meant for playback.  HOWEVER :)
> >> 
snip ---- snip
> > In the mid 80's I wrote some Z80 assembler code to control a midi interface.
> > So I would be quite interested in a re-write of the lily midi code. But I am
> > not sure how many people would be interested.
> 
> I think that improved MIDI output is one of the most-requested enhancements
> for LilyPond.  There would be *lots* of people interested in better MIDI.
> If you were interested and willing to take it over, that would be great.
> 
> The problem is that right now, nobody is a champion for MIDI output.
> 

Yes I would be interested in this. C++, scheme and Python aren't a
problem for me but I've not used git or Rietveld before, but it doesn't
look like there's anything very difficult there and I guess there are
plenty of people who will help if I get stuck.

The main thing for the moment will be getting to know the lily code.

Cheers

/Bernard


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to