Is there any point in anyone working on 1474 before this is resolved?
/Bernard
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:24:16PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <k-ohara5...@oco.net>
> To: <k-ohara5...@oco.net>
> Cc: <re...@codereview.appspotmail.com>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 5:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Fix 1120 in a way to avoid issues 1472, 1474 (issue4095041)
>
>
>> Extended to cover the other issues that were fixed along with 1120. The
>> regression test that /could/ have caught the breakage of issue 1120 is
>> revised so it will (more likely) catch any future breakage.
>
>
> FWIW had I been running my pixel comparator then, I'd have spotted this
> easily.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
