On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > On 1/29/11 6:20 AM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:19:10PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: >>> I meant to post this to -devel a while ago, but I opened a Github >>> tracker issue for GUB. >>> https://github.com/janneke/gub/issues#issue/2 >> >> Interesting. How do I get a proper git format-patch version of >> this? The raw link gives me a plain diff. The "download" gives >> me a tarball, which contains a plain diff. >> >> Why does it seem like every code review tool out there strips out >> the commit message and author from git patches? :( I can >> vaguely excuse codereview, since it was intended for svn... but >> github?! >> >> Please tell me that my old eyes completely missed some "get patch" >> button somewhere. > > It appears to me that the desired work flow for this is for the submitter > (Patrick in this case) to make a "pull request", at which time the applier > can do the pull and the patch will have the original author stuff.
Yes, this is the typical work flow for Github. Once we figure out a proper patch to merge, we have the option of submitting a pull request. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
