On 2011/02/12 10:08:57, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I'd rather drop the first two examples illustrating the problem. It
is stated
clearly enough, and bad examples shouldn't appear in the docs.
Otherwise it
looks OK to me.
I'd agree with Trevor's general point, for the NR anyway, I like to try to not say 'in this example...' or 'in the following example..\' and so on and then present an @lilypond. Just state the difference/behaviour and then the @lilypond. Less friendly (more LM) but to the point. http://codereview.appspot.com/4160048/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
