On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joe Neeman <joenee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > - SCM footnotes_ to Stencil,
>> > - scm_gc_mark (footnotes_) to Stencil::mark_smob (for SCM garbage
>> > collection)
>> > - footnotes_ = scm_append (footnotes_, s.footnotes_)
>> > to Stencil::add_stencil
>> > - a scheme function ly:stencil::make-footnote which takes a stencil
>> > and creates an empty stencil with the given stencil in its footnote list
>> >
>> > then the footnotes should be accessible from the stencil when you make the
>> > Prob.
>>
>> I hope this is just a hack, to add footnotes to Stencil...
>>
>> Ok, so maybe this isn't a good idea. What about creating a new version of
>> Text_interface::interpret_markup that recurses through the markup looking
>> for footnotes?
>>
>> Joe
>
> That's exactly what I just did...uploading patch soon!
>
> Cheers,
> MS
A new patch set is up @ http://codereview.appspot.com/4213042 .
input/regression/footnotes.ly added as per Reinhold's request.
Cheers,
Mike
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
