>> well, 2*radius+2 then? Anything that indicates how this number is
>> formed is ok.
>
> Ah, sorry. I missed what you meant.
> Well, this nuber is not formed :) It shouldn't depend on
> staff_radius. This number determines what the steepness of
> transition should be (i.e., what the angle of the red line in the
> attachment will be). This angle shouldn't depend on Staff_radius in
> my opinion.
Then add this comment to the sources and mark the value as heuristic.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
