On 5 March 2011 14:38, Mike Solomon <mike...@ufl.edu> wrote: > Done - thanks for bearing with me as I learn about break-visibility. It is a > corner of the code that I never had to deal with directly, so I'm still > getting my sea legs.
I suggest you remove the fallback value from inherit-x-parent-visibility (or if you prefer, add another callback for y-parent visibility without a default) otherwise grobs which don't care about break-visibility (such as noteheads) will lose their footnotes. > If you feel this is too hackish, I could make this direction-only (LEFT, > CENTER, RIGHT) with CENTER defaulting to LEFT and have the footnote only > apply to the first and last spanner. But, for long spanners, this seems less > than ideal. As always, your suggestions are welcome! I'm afraid I'm at a loss to suggest anything better, so I'll have to put up with it (unless anybody else can think of a better way. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
