On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:58 PM, <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:

> On 2011/03/20 05:46:51, joeneeman wrote:
>
>> This can be fixed by adding
>> if (!pure)
>>
>
> Thanks very much.
>
> Just in case anybody wonders, we can safely put the assignment to
> after_affinity inside the  if (!pure)  with no change, because that
> assignment can't change behavior.  If after_affinity > before_affinity
> then we know  before_affinity != UP  so we will return without ever
> using after_affinity.


In that case, is there any need to set after_affinity at all?
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to