On Mar 22, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 10 March 2011 10:06, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: >> On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:17 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> Does `annotation-whiteout' do anything special? If not, the existing >>> property `whiteout' should suffice. >>> >> >> It puts a whiteout only around the annotation instead of whiting out the >> entire grob (line + annotation). > > You're only using it for automatic numbering, so it could be > incorporated into the markup command instead. > > If you still think it's necessary though, you need to rethink the way > the whiteout's being applied; currently, you're applying > `stencil-whiteout' to the evaluated markup, then setting 'text to the > new value. You can't do this since it's a property type mismatch: > 'text expects markup, not a stencil.
A workaround would be to create a markup in page-layout-problem.cc, in which case my question would be: is there a clean way to create markups on the C++ side, or should I create a public scheme function & call it from the C++ side? Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
