On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:51:16AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/4/4 <percival.music...@gmail.com>
> >
> > This patch loses flags! is that deliberate?!
> > stem-tremolo.ly
> > flags-default.ly
> > beam-collision-beamcount.ly
> > ... etc...
>
> Did you "make clean" before building?
No, sorry! My fault. I'll check this again.
> The
> question is: should we use word "standard" or maybe "default" or
> "normal" (for regular flags)? Word "standard" has one problem: it
> blends with direction ("standardu" looks acceptable, but "standardd"
> can be confusing at first sight.). Also, i'm not sure which one has
> the best-fitting meaning. Maybe "regular"?
I'd go with "normal".
> Sorry for that. I though that patch_review meant that it's time that
> other people see this and give their opinions, not necessarily that
> the patch is ready for including.
> I was puzzled and worried why there were no reviews for a whole week
> and thought that maybe needs_work label was the cause.
Ah. Well, unfortunately we (as a developer community) do not tend
to review patches very often.
Think about it this way: how many times have you reviewed my build
system patches, or Colin's documentation patches? The same
reasons why you don't review those patches apply to people looking
at your patches.
I have some plans to improve this, but like all our "social
problems", I'm waiting until 2.14 is out first.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
