Am Sonntag, 1. Mai 2011, um 23:36:16 schrieb David Kastrup: > Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > > Both methods will work, but one of them feels a bit "off". > > > >> >and then try: > >> > git-cl > >> > > >> >you should get a "git cl help" message at this point. > >> > >> Yup :-). Is the CG in error - it says git cl, not git-cl? > > > > It should be fine either way. > > Why? AFAICS, git some-command searches a git-internal directory for a > git-some-command binary.
Nope. "git <command>" also searches the $PATH for the git-<command> binary. > If you did not place the git-cl binary there, > you can't use git cl instead. If you did place it there, you can't use > git-cl as it won't be in the path. Clearly no problem as git searches the path. Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
