On May 22, 2011, at 3:23 PM, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote: > > What if instead of setting a boolean stem-ignore, you just set > stem-attachment = ##f in order to get this behavior? This would be > consistent > with setting stencil = ##f in order to eliminate the stencil. > > If you want to keep a separate boolean, I think I'd prefer the name > no-stem to stem-ignore. The object of the property is to get a notehead > without a stem, and no-stem seems to communicate that better than > stem-ignore, IMO. > > Carl >
Great idea! It slims down the patch by a factor of 3. I've uploaded a new patch w/ your suggestions @ http://codereview.appspot.com/4547058. Lemme know what you think! Cheers, Mike _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
