On 5/28/11 8:24 AM, "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> > To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> > Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:40 PM > Subject: Re: make doc > > >> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: >>> Is the aim with make docs to try to make it silent, unless there are >>> errors, like we have done with make website? >> >> Yes. Ideally we should have no texinfo errors, no .ly errors, etc >> etc. >> >>> I realise that to make this happen there will have to be lots of >>> work to understand it better, >> >> ETA: 150 hours for the English docs alone. Another 50-100 hours >> for the translations. >> >>> Is it worth raising a tracking issue report? >> >> I wouldn't bother adding an issue to the tracker, but there's >> certainly no harm in doing so. >> >> Cheers, >> - Graham >> > > OK - one of the first things I see is that lilypond is always invoked with > the --verbose flag - so each time we call lilypond (and it's quite a bit - > over 180 as an estimate from grep) we get 100s of lines of lilypond debug > output - this probably adds 20-30,000 lines to the output. My suggestion > for task 1 is to get rid of the --verbose flag. Any idea why it's there? So we can see which scm files are loaded, etc. It's very helpful in debugging problems. Certainly lose it with the -s flag. Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
