Carl Sorensen writes: >> I think the best thing is to get 2.14.0 out now, include a warning >> that it doesn't work on windows 7 SP1 but that we're testing a fix >> and hope to have a new version out soon. Then we switch to >> ghostscript-9.0 in 2.15.0 and start testing.
Sure, however/or esp. as: > Actually, the last patch than Jan posted should make LilyPond work on > windows 7 sp1, IIUC. So as long as we backport that patch, we're good with > windows. Indeed! Ghostscript 9.0 is not required, neither is freetype 2.4.4 -- but I had to check and now they're available [for testing anyway]. > P.S. I'm glad this whole gs9 thing came up. I was having weird bugs doing > make doc on my (OSX) system, and chord names had the wrong font. As a > result of all the discussion about gs9, I reset my gs to 8.73, and > everything went away. Hmm, and you were at gs9? -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
