On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 03:27:14PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" > <gra...@percival-music.ca> > >If that's true, then maybe this should be added. It'd be another > >of those 5-lines patches that takes 5 hours to write, though. > > I don't think so - to do this, I'd propose to add a flag to > lilypond-book, -r. If the -r flag is present, l-book would redirect > all output from compiling 1234abcd.ly to 1234abcd.log in the same > directory as the input file. You OK with that?
That would be absolutely ideal! I'm not totally sold on using -r since that tends to be used for "recursive". How about just make it --redirect-lilypond-output ? This isn't a command that people will need to type by hand a lot (or even), so I think a long+descriptive name would be perfect. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
