On 22 June 2011 22:48, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
> In this present case, I could see the bound info being calculated via a > callback that fetches the 'quantized position property for the Y values, but > the X values would still need to be calculated by consulting the normal stems > à la lines 559-570. Were I to place the calculation in a callback, it would > require a code dup of these lines. To avoid this, I could create a property > called x-positions and change the name of positions to y-positions and > quantized positions to quantized-y-positions. Then, I'd put lines 559-570 in > a separate callback for the X positions. Lemme know if this sounds good. I think I'd rather you keep the slightly unidiomatic code than rename properties (particularly since renaming positions will affect other grobs). Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
