On 4 July 2011 15:31, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > Would a redundant check of settings from default context definitions be a > problem? I can't imagine that such a check would take 1% of the processing > time.
I don't know, though I agree is unlikely to be a significant overhead. > Plus, I don't think it's really a redundant check; I think it's a real > check. Absent such a check, we're trusting on the *-init.ly files being > correct, which admits a potential programming error. The *-init.ly files are covered by regression testing since -dcheck-internal-types triggers an assertion error for incorrect context property settings. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
