On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 13 July 2011 21:03, Neil Puttock <n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 13 July 2011 20:51, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Was I too narrow in my original fix? I can work on something cleaner to
>>> address the segfault that doesn't lead to cyclical dependencies so that
>>> this doesn't perturb future generations of regtests.
>>
>> That would be great.
>
> One other thing: the regression test is too complicated; AFAICT, the
> original crash was caused by a beamed skip combined with a rest, so it
> could be condensed to a single beat:
>
> \new Voice << { r4 } { s8[ s] } >>
>
> Cheers,
> Neil
>
Ok, I'll work on it.
Cheers,
MS
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
