On Jul 18, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > 2011/7/18 Joe Neeman <joenee...@gmail.com>: >> 2011/7/17 Janek Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com>: >>> I've searched in note-head.cc, note-column.cc, note-heads-engraver.cc >>> but found nothing... >> >> I believe it defaults to ly:grob::stencil-width (probably in grob.cc). > > 2011/7/17 Neil Puttock <n.putt...@gmail.com>: >> 2011/7/17 Janek Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com>: >>> I've searched in note-head.cc, note-column.cc, note-heads-engraver.cc >>> but found nothing... >> >> You don't need to know this (though if you're curious, any grob >> without a default is set to ly:grob::stencil-width; see the >> constructor in grob.cc). > > i don't see anything called "stencil-width" in grob.cc... > >> If you want to know the extent, just use Grob::extent (). > > I don't want to read the value of extent, i want to modify how it's > calculated in case of noteheads. > I suppose that noteheads X-extent is wrongly calculated now. Judging > by this > http://lilypond.googlecode.com/issues/attachment?aid=-4756087064344904294&name=test.png&token=22aa1208ff6775e1780efcedc7e7e841&inline=1 > , all noteheads are assigned the same X-extent, even though the glyphs > have different widths. > Or maybe i don't understand how it works... > > thanks, > Janek
The issue is in the metafont file: see line 160ish in feta-noteheads.mf. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
