Jan Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> writes: > 2011/7/29 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > >> All I know is that it can't be me for the remainder of 2011. In >> the first place I'd be an iffy choice due to my relative >> inexperience with lilypond programming, but the main reason is >> that I'm needed to run GOP and GLISS. > > Then i think it can't be you till 2013. I don't believe we'll sort > GLISS out in less than a year ^^ > I have lots, *lots* of issues myself. > >> We could have rotating leaders -- Carl for a month while they work >> on fret stuff, Neil for two months while they work on fundamental >> scheme stuff, Keith for a month while they work on spacing stuff, >> Bertrand for a month while they work on ancient notation? > > That's fine, but i asked who the "central authority" would be. The > one who will decide "we work for a month on frets under Carl's > leadership, on Scheme under Neil's, and after that on this, and that." > You know, the Grand Master. > Hmm. Han-Wen?
I think that this plan is not compatible available with the available resources. I don't see an abundance of programmers waiting to get assigned an area they'll get comfortable with in the course of few weeks, then move on to the next area. The best I can imagine to make sense is to have BOF workshops at free software conferences that focus on a particular area with the aim to put as many issues in the tracker behind, under the lead of a suitable volunteer. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
