W dniu 30 lipca 2011 18:18 użytkownik Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> napisał: > > On 7/30/11 9:33 AM, "Jan Warchoł" <lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I see... >> The more i think about it, the more i feel it would be good to merge >> \set, \override and \tweak into one thingy. Doing so would make music >> functions like above one quite simpler. > > While I could see that perhaps we could combine \set and \override, we > cannot combine \tweak. > > \override and \set modify everything at the current moment. > > \tweak modifies only a single grob. > > The distinction between \override and \tweak needs to stay because it is a > semantic distinction.
Hmm, i'd say that \once \override could work like tweak. Currently \once \override affects all objects created at the same moment in given context, but i think it wouldn't be of much inconvenience if it affected only a single object, like tweak does. The reason i'm so concerned about it is because today i managed to do unbelieveable amount of mistakes when trying to move a markup. I've forgotten about the hash, the quote and the dash (in different combinations) before i finally wrote -\tweak #'X-offset #3 . At some moment i even thought it cannot be done like that. A shame - only i'm not sure who should be ashamed more, me or Lily :P cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
