Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> writes: > David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes: > >> Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes: >> > >> > Unless somebody objects, I will remove 'nested-property-revert.ly' from >> > the test suite; The test code still exists in the open issue 1063. >> >> I'd like to keep this test as I am working on the full functionality. >> It will likely get extended in the end to cover more cases, but it is >> useful as a start already. > > Thanks, David. > > Since you are keeping a copy, and there is a copy on 1063, I will remove it > from input/regression right away. > > Don't forget to make an extra copy before you next rebase the branch on which > you are working on 1063; you will probably need to `git add` it back to that > branch.
Looks like we associate differing meanings with one or several of the words "unless", "somebody" or "objects". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
