On 7 August 2011 20:48, Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't go that lowlevel. I rather thought about a scheme function that > prints a ly:warning and then returns the new definition (or calls the new > function). How would you prevent the deprecation warning from being issued when the identifier is created? Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
