On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:06:16 -0700, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:59:02AM +0000, Keith OHara wrote:
Graham Percival <graham <at> percival-music.ca> writes:
> Type-critical:
>
You might want to split this into two:
regressions to the output of Lilypond, and
critical impediments to development
Why bother splitting it? I forsee an average weekly count of 2
Critical regressions, and 0.15 critical impediments to
development.
Good point. Probably not worth splitting them.
I was merely noting that they are conceptually different.
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:02:51 -0700, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk>
wrote:
Graham Percival <graham <at> percival-music.ca> writes:
> * Type-ignorance: (fixme name?) it is not clear what the
> correct output should look like.
Why not use a label to indicate this? That would enable a short
list of these to be displayed if someone
came across a pertinent example but couldn't
remember the issue number.
That will work; now we can think of a name for the label.
Need_clarification
Need_goal
What_should_Lily_do
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
