Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > Given that Cmake has a large following (examples include KDE and > LLVM), I'd be comfortable with switching to that.
Interesting; have you ever used Cmake? Last time I looked (migrated a cmake project to autotools), Cmake did only have proprietary documentation (I hear most documentation is in a wiki now), introduced a rather crappy home brew language, cached make information in generated makefiles that do not use variables for $(CC) or $(CFLAGS), has a IMHO nasty way of overriding such variables on the cmake command line. Also, it did not have an easy way to create help from the command line or a facility to have virtual targets or a nice way to say: `make -C lily out/parser.o' because all file names were absolute, fully expanded names. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
