On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:32:20AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Please read: > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/lilypond-formatting > > in particular the point about #. ... > I interpret as being used for inline samples and the like.
Ah, good point! I glanced at the subject line and didn't notice that you were only changing the "text" parts and not @lilypond parts. I withdraw this complaint. > Please be more specific what I'm missing. In particular, many > locations which I've fixed (at least in my opinion) were talking > about, say, `#t' and `#foo' at the same time, which I consider *very* > confusing. There are two possiblities to fix it: Either by saying > `#t' and `foo', or by saying `##t' and `#foo'. Hmm. I still have no clue about the difference between #t and #foo, which certainly emphasizes that there *is* confusion. The decision to always prepend with a # for any lilypond input which accepts it (even if not strictly necessary) was made in GDP, but that only narrows it down to Sep 2007 - Aug 2008. I think it was in the first half, but that doesn't help much. :( I spent a few minutes looking through the email archives without finding the discussion, sorry. However, that discussion was specifically about @lilypond stuff, not the text. So I'm now ok with this change; thanks for explaining it to me. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
