On Aug 28, 2011, at 12:51 PM, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: > Mike I get a failed patch apply here on the current tre (28 Aug) > > --snip-- >
You were applying an old patch that conflicted with current master. I rebased and pushed as 7623fef74bf21fc726a8c60b535e7794f9776700. > Also we have a number of tracker issues for temolos and I am wondering > if this covers one or more of these: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1444 > These are chord tremolos (not stem tremolos), so it is a different issue. > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=376 I don't think this is a bug...it seems like a statement of personal preference, and should be corroborated by the literature. > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=704 > idem - chord tremolos. > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1087 idem - chord tremolos. > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=734 > My patch doesn't fix this. However, it facilitates the fixing of this. If someone wants to take a crack at it, go to Stem_tremolo::y_offset and use: final_y_offset = minmax (direction_of_stem, final_y_offset - direction_of_stem * me->extent(me, Y_AXIS)[direction_of_stem], height_of_staff_symbol[direction_of_stem]); A similar thing would need to be done for the pure heights. The above is pseudo-code, but hopefully you get the idea. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel