2011/9/13 Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: > >> I think the solution is to create a shorter variaton of accidental >> glyphs; an example in the attachment. How do you like this idea? >> Do you think all accidentals should have shorter versions, or would >> it be overkill to create for example a shorter version of 3-stemmed >> sharp or arrowed flat? > > Basically, I like the idea. However, it is an illusion IMHO to > believe that such glyphs will fit all text fonts.
True. Still, i think that shorter accidentals will be an improvement. > For figured bass, the situation is different: Here we use LilyPond's > digit font, which is completely under our control, and having > accidentals fitting those digits better is a good thing. I will prepare shorter versions of accidentals. Would you help me with writing code that employs them? I did a quick glance at the code (chord-name-engraver, figured-bass-engraver) but i don't know where to start. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
