Reviewers: ,
Message:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-09/msg00331.html
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1909
Description:
Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/
Affected files:
M Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
Index: Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
diff --git a/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
b/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
index
d9d2fb2faaca63f9e7e3d9dcce460c1c044945cd..6c4427d8c18e14e5ec32ae1e4735a1108cdebae2
100644
--- a/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
+++ b/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
@@ -255,6 +255,11 @@ that each interval contains.
}
@end lilypond
+If you carefully consider all the rules above and remember that the
+octave of absolute pitches is also specified disregarding any
+accidentals, one rather interesting consequence is that the first note
+inside @code{@w{\relative f}} music is interpreted just the same as
+if it was written in absolute pitch mode.
@seealso
Music Glossary:
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
