"m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes: > On Oct 1, 2011, at 9:29 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> This sounds really really icky. The sort of code I hope never to >> need to deal with. Could you file a suitable "Enhancement" issue so >> that redoing this in a less hackish manner does not get forgotten? >> That way I have a better chance for my hopes becoming true. >> > > Actually, I found a robust_scm2drul that does the trick and pushed it > to master. So now, no more kludgy code. Sorry for the panic - I have > no clue why my unoptimized binary wasn't failing :(
We still have a "performance regression on Windows, not on Linux" bug open, so for whatever reason, we appear to have a divergence in code paths. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
