"m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes:
> \markup { \column { \italic foo bar }} would use line as its layout
> manager and have two elements, one markup that used nothing as its
> layout manager (markups with 1 element cannot have layout managers)
> and had no transformations and one markup that used nothing as its
> layout manger and had an italic transformation.
>
> In this representation, box-layout-across-pages could be a layout
> manager that works like markuplines. The page breaker would take all
> top level markups, check the layout managers, and automatically create
> chunks based on the layout manager being used.
Will
z = \markuplist { a b c }
\markup { \concat \z }
still work? That is one of the reasons I want "\markuplist" rather than
"\markuplines" since it has nothing to do whatsoever with lines before
it actually gets put into a context wanting to interpret it as such.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
