Adam, On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Adam Spiers <lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kieren MacMillan > <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: >>> I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having >>> two 'similar' functions >>> >>> \hideNote >>> \hideNotes >>> >>> Is a good idea. >> >> I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g., \sustainOn >> and \sustainOff). >> So we should have \hideNotesOn and \hideNotesOff, right? Then \hideNote >> could stand for "\once \hideNotesOn". >> That seems clear to me. > > Ah, that makes sense. I could do the rename, but is there some process > for handling non-backwards-compatible changes in syntax? >
Don't want to sound like a bore but all this (and other things you will probably run into) is pretty well documented in our Contributor;s Guide. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/adding-or-modifying-features James -- -- James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
