Hello, On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Colin Campbell <c...@shaw.ca> wrote: > On 11-11-07 12:46 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Neil Puttock<n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 7 November 2011 19:32, Graham Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Failing either of these, I guess we're into git bisect time, which >>>> of course sucks for doc-building if you're not Phil or James. I >>>> know that Phil can build the docs, but hopefully James' computer >>>> will fail in this same way? >>> >>> I've just finished building the docs without incident. >> >> I ran it again without -j2 and it completed fine. *shrug* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> > > > ISTR there's a long standing problem with forking make doc, although the > initial make to [roduce the binaries seems not to mind. >
Yes there is or 'was' I've noticed that in the last few days I have been running make -j7 I have *not* been getting those weird 'authors.texi' type errors or those 'file not found' type problems that 'go away' running make again. Every patch that has applied has passed make with no issues at all. Whereas previously I'd have to run make twice nearly every time. So I wonder if any recent build changes have made the difference. -- -- James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
