On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ian Hulin <i...@hulin.org.uk> wrote:
> I pulled out and tested the examples in separate .ly file and the
> format that fails is
> #(define-markup-command (double-box layout props text) (markup?)
> "Draw a double box around text."
> (interpret-markup layout props
> #{\markup \override #'(box-padding . 0.4) \box
> \override #'(box-padding . 0.6) \box { $text }#}))
> \markup \double-box A
Since the person writing the code is writing Scheme already, requiring
the inner markups to be in Scheme is a reasonable restriction, IMO.
That said, it would be nice if #{ #} could be made to work, but I not
enough insight into how it works.
What is the rationale for putting the markups in a separate module?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
