On 2011/12/30 20:57:02, Graham Percival wrote:
Patchy will not question any ridiculous git history that arises due to any kind of weird series of
commands
in git.
Maybe it would make sense if Patchy refused fast forwarding over a history involving a merge _from_ staging. I think that merges should just be from master; a merge from staging implies a merging pull, and I can't think of a situation where we would want to see those in the history of master. http://codereview.appspot.com/5504092/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
