On 12/30/11 6:40 PM, "Francisco Vila" <paconet....@gmail.com> wrote:
>2011/12/31 Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>: >>> Begin LilyPond compile, commit: >>>2f25894efd8ad242b233d5a1d07afcfa087ebab2 >>> >>> *** FAILED STEP *** >>> >>> merge from staging >>> >>> maybe somebody pushed a commit directly to master? >> >> Francisco merged translation with staging, and apparently also with >>master. (The commit message says merge with staging, but the commit is >>on master and is the parent of staging. >> >> I suspect that we have not yet worked out the right way to deal with >>translations, and I don't know enough git to know what to recommend. >> >> David, any ideas? > >I performed a single 'merge lilypond/translation' command while on >staging. >Then I performed a single 'push origin staging' command. I have not >touched master. I did not 'git checkout master'. I did not push >master. I did not mention master on my keyboard or in my thoughts. I >have had nightmares about master in the past, but master is off my >life now. Master does not exist for me anymore. > >I suspect one way or another master and staging are the same thing, >which is not my fault. Please don't consider my email one of assigning blame, Francisco. You have a procedure that has worked for you for a long time. We changed that procedure. It's not yet worked out. The fault is in the procedure, not in the person. I suspect that we gave you commands that set it so your local staging branch is tracking origin/master, rather than origin/staging. So *for you*, staging is the same branch as origin/master. And I'm trying to figure out how to diagnose this. For starters, can you look at the file .git/config (in your lilypond source top-level directory)? Here are my entries: [remote "origin"] url = carldsoren...@git.sv.gnu.org:/srv/git/lilypond.git fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* [branch "master"] remote = origin merge = master [branch "staging"] remote = origin merge = refs/heads/staging I think the "merge = refs/heads/staging" line is the one that ties my staging branch to origin/staging. I suspect you may have the following: [branch "staging"] remote = origin merge = master Anyway, don't panic, and we'll get this figured out. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel