Hello, On 3 January 2012 18:31, <hashas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Reviewers: Graham Percival, > > Message: > On 2012/01/01 23:14:05, Graham Percival wrote: >> >> LGTM, but I had to add issue 2166 to track this. > > > Sorry, didn't understand what you mean by "add issue 2166 to track this"
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2166 We use Google tracker for any issue we have a patch for on Rietveld Normally you would use git-cl that comes with the LilyPond Code as per the Contributor's Guide to upload the patch and during the upload you'd be prompted for a tracker issue. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/commits-and-patches#uploading-a-patch-for-review The tracker is required, among other things, so our automated scripts can test all 'new' google tracker patches to make sure they apply. Without a tracker issue code uploaded to Rietveld gets missed and so slows down the eventual pushing of this. > > Anything I can do to help this to get live? Well, the patch has been changed to 'countdown' see: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor-big-page#summary-for-experienced-developers under 'reviews'. Hope this helps. -- -- James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
