"m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes:

> Probably a real bug.
>
> The patch (which I wrote) was a crappy patch to begin with: I applied
> it to be able to do some experiments with horizontal spacing, which I
> did, but they all lead to circular dependencies so I gave up.  I
> thought the change was innocuous but if it's not there's no point
> keeping it - we can just revert.

No change introducing any amount of complexity without purpose is
innocuous.  It will slow down people understanding LilyPond's code.  In
particular, if not even the patch author itself understands the code.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to