"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> > To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 4:54 PM > Subject: Re: Staging->Master > > >> "Phil Holmes" <em...@philholmes.net> writes: >> >>> I see that master has been updated with some patches from staging. >>> Who was it that ran patchy to do this? >> >> That would have been me. Since yesterday, I have a laptop with Core 2 >> duo processors available, and I've been running either flavor of patchy >> a few times since in order to celebrate this in style. If it is keeping >> you from making meaningful experiments, I will stop. > > My experimentation phase has ended and I was expecting to have to run > patchy-staging a couple of times a day until someone else was in a > position to take over.
My box is not on permanently, and I don't run regularly, and use it for other work. So "take over" is putting it too strongly. > I believe James indicated his big machine was on 24x7 - hence my > instructions if he has some time to look at this. I think that this would be the preferable solution. Even though patchy is quite less painful on my current machine than on the one I had been using a few days ago, it takes its time. > If you can run it a couple of times a day - no problem - I'll not do > it myself. I don't even think that staging moves that often currently. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
