On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:52 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> I disagree. Reading code the first time is hard, that is true, but >> unless anything surprising is happening, it does not deserve a >> comment. The more you read code, the easier it becomes, and think of >> this as you learning how to read. In an analog: beginners books may >> feature simpler words, hy-phe-na-te all words explicitly and use >> pictures, but that doesn't mean literature for grownups should have >> those. > > The problem with much of the LilyPond code base is not that it is short > in comments paraphrasing the code:
Right. > I've just looked at the part combiner code, and it creates complex GOOPS We're talking about the note collision code, though. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
