On 12-03-01 10:23 AM, ptrcklsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well it would certainly be easier for me if we opened a new issue for
this patch as it contains fixes for several bugs I reported lately. For
some of them no issues were opened. Here are the bugs / reports at
stake:
-) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1983
This sounds very straightforward; can you cook up a small patch
restricted to this item alone
-)
http://old.nabble.com/musicxml2ly%3A-chordnames-placement-bug-td33309393.html
This one sounds like issue 1969, and could probably be added as a comment.
-) http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2012-02/msg00519.html
I also added 2 lines to Usage as the new command line options -m and
--midi hadn't been added yet.
Because this one brings in the MIDI set of . . . complications . . . it
should probably have a separate tracker item.
Beyond that I have a partial fix for
(http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1969). Should I make
a new patch or can I add the code here?
This would involve creating a Rietveld item referencing tracker 1969,
which would be the better way of handling the work in process patch.
I gather you would like to create a single tracker item and merge all
the above into it, but that might make the result rather too broad for
easy review and analysis.
Cheers,
Colin
--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-Maya Angelou, poet (1928- )
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
