Hello, On 7 March 2012 23:42, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Well, "somebody" will likely be me, of course. Sleep is overrated. >> make check is not all that slow, and I can leave the full doc build to >> Patchy (assuming he is still on regular duty: there is actually no >> reason why he shouldn't be). That leaves the translations. Now we >> can reset them if needed, but I prefer not to do that since rewinding >> published history is a nuisance, and I don't really want to force the >> translators to mess more with their repositories than necessary. I >> suppose I'll push that thing shortly and hope for the best. > > I pushed both the translation branch as well as staging. The fixed > translation branch is merged into staging, but I have not merged staging > (hopefully master soon: I think midnight GMT is in 20 minutes, and that > should trigger James' patchy) back into translation. > > Translators should first check that lilypond/translation is in a > consistent state (I am doubtful about the committishes). Once it is > considered fine, one can merge the (hopefully) new master back, and the > two should be reasonably synced again. > > -- > David Kastrup > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Do you still want me to keep patchy going? I'll pause it for now and if I hear nothing I'll kick it off. Or do you want me to do a make/make doc on something? I'll be around for the next 30 mins or so (until around 00:30 BST). Regards -- -- James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel