James <pkx1...@gmail.com> writes: > I am not at home but Patchy complained just now. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <pkx1...@gmail.com> > Date: 14 March 2012 18:34 > Subject: Patchy email > > > > Merged staging, now at: c6a925ecd742196979038804b02846faad7f2cc9 > > Success: ./autogen.sh --noconfigure > > Success: ../configure --disable-optimising > > Success: nice make clean -j6 CPU_COUNT=6 > > Success: nice make -j6 CPU_COUNT=6 > > Success: nice make test -j6 CPU_COUNT=6 > > *** FAILED BUILD *** > > nice make doc -j6 CPU_COUNT=6 > > Previous good commit: d11dbf277719c0179c5520154c925839d969a535 > > Current broken commit: c6a925ecd742196979038804b02846faad7f2cc9
Documentation has not been touched between master and staging. A change by Carl would have triggered more likely in "make test" than in "make doc". That makes changes from me (or a Heisenbug) most likely. My personal suspect would have been commit 65c8ce914c62117fb61a21237f7dcf80ebb0cc6e Author: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> Date: Sun Mar 11 12:16:52 2012 +0100 Make Score an initial Timing alias to allow for context mods But then I am pretty certain that I actually ran "make info" on that one to make reasonably sure it did not cause offense. I am taking a look right now. If you have relevant log file data, it might speed things up. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel