On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:39:11PM +0000, James wrote: >> I think this needs to be reviewed just like any other patch should be, >> why *would* we just push this? > > Well, I think this one is simple enough to push directly.
Shall i do this? And shall i not ask next time? ;) >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=d11dbf277719c0179c5520154c925839d969a535 >> >> I might have missed this but did this have a tracker/patchy test? > > I think that was also simple enough not to need an individual > patchy test. As long as it was pushed to staging and not master, > stuff that simple is fine. That was also my reasoning. It's unbelievable how much time is spend on patch maintenance... A simple change can take 5 days (in my case it means 5 days of constant awareness about the patch)... cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
